homeabout the showviewer's guidemake your casemultimediaresources
Today's DockettUpcoming casesStation Search
Upcoming cases
(In your city, Judge Hatchett may air twice a day. Check your local listings for programming information.)

Monday 11/23/2009

Lakisha Randolph vs. Marc Goodie
Lakisha Randolph wants a DNA test to prove her ex-boyfriend, Marc Goodie, is the father of her four-year-old son, Kayo, and her four-month-old daughter, Sidney. Lakisha says Marc is a "coward" who "dumped" her "over the phone" when she was six months pregnant. She maintains Marc is a "conman" who only stays with women that "spend money on him." Lakisha says Marc may have "robbed me of my youth and innocence," but he's not going to "rob" his children of the support they "deserve." Marc says he "doubts" he's the father of Lakisha's son, Kayo, because they only "had sex once" around the time she got pregnant. He also insists he "can't be" the father of her baby girl, Sidney, because he "used protection" at the time she would have been conceived. Marc says he should have "stopped sleeping with Lakisha" after she had him "thrown in jail for the third time." Will Judge Hatchett's DNA results "protect" Marc from having to pay child support?



Tuesday 11/24/2009

Amanda Childres vs. Chris Childres
Amanda Childres wants a DNA test to prove her ex-husband, Chris Childres, is the father of her five-year-old son, Josh. Amanda insists she is "100% sure" Chris is Josh's dad because she was "never unfaithful," even though Chris "constantly" accused her of infidelity. Amanda claims Chris cheated on her "more than once" and "abandoned" her when Josh was born prematurely. Amanda wants Josh to "step up to the plate" and support his son. Chris contends he has "every right" to doubt he's Josh's father, because he "knows for a fact" Amanda cheated on him, and she allegedly admitted it. Chris's mom, Spring Childres, adds Amanda is such a "liar," she even "faked a miscarriage," and she's hoping the DNA test will get Amanda "out of Chris's life for good." Whose "convoluted claims" will be exposed once Judge Hatchett reveals the DNA results?



Wednesday 11/25/2009

Elisha Lee vs. Tyrone Cooper
Elisha Lee wants a DNA test to prove her ex-boyfriend, Tyrone Cooper, is the father of her eight-month-old daughter, Kaylah. Elisha says Tyrone's family "turned him against me" because they think she's too old for him and suspect Elisha cheated on him. Elisha denies cheating on Tyrone and insists his grandmother, Loretta Brown, is a "psycho" who "stalked" Elisha at her job when she found out Elisha was pregnant. Elisha says she is "heartbroken" because Tyrone has "bought into his family's lies" and is ignoring his baby. Tyrone claims his family "loved" Elisha until they realized she was "crazy" after faking a miscarriage. Tyrone contends he has every reason to doubt he's Kaylah's father because he caught Elisha with her hands in "another man's cookie jar." Grandma Loretta argues Elisha is such an "evil schemer" she wouldn't be surprised if the baby Elisha's "pinning" on Tyrone isn't even hers. Will Judge Hatchett need DNA results to satisfy inquiries regarding both paternity and maternity?



Thursday 11/26/2009

Lonnie Clark vs. Durallis
Lonnie Clark wants a DNA test to prove her ex-boyfriend, Durallis Bell, is the father of her nine-month-old son, Karony. Lonnie says she is "150% sure" Durallis is her son's father because she was "absolutely monogamous" with Durallis at the time of Karony's conception. Lonnie also contends Durallis told her he "deliberately" tried to get her pregnant. Lonnie argues that although Durallis is a "drunk deadbeat" who already has "three babies with three different women," there is "no way" she's going to let him "ignore" her son. Durallis maintains he is "100% sure" he is not Karony's father because he's "just one of many men" with whom Lonnie's been intimate, including her own husband. Durallis says Lonnie is a "desperate" girl who will "do anything to hook a guy like me, including faking a miscarriage just to receive sympathy." Can today's angry accusations be sorted out once Judge Hatchett reveals the results of the DNA test?



Friday 11/27/2009

Larry Wright vs. Abigaile Casique
Larry Wright wants a DNA test to prove he's not the father of his ex-girlfriend, Abigaile Casique's, 3-year-old son. Larry says he only had sex with Abigaile twice, and claims he used a condom both times, so there is no way he can be the father. Larry says Abigaile confessed that she cheated on him, so he was "shocked" when the government started garnishing his wages "out of nowhere." Larry says he's "fed up" with feeding another man's child when he can't afford to feed his own wife and son. Abigaile claims Larry is the one who cheated, not her, and that's why she "dumped" him. Abigaile says she was "stunned" when she found out she was pregnant, but she knows Larry is the only man who could have impregnated her. Abigaile says she never wanted Larry's money, but she does expect Larry to stop being "a jerk" to his son, and start acting like a father. Tune in as Judge Hatchett determines the paternity of this 3-year old boy.